All articles

November 3, 2026

How to Convert the Kazakhstani Grading System to a US GPA

Why current transcripts can carry a Soviet-legacy 5-point mark, a Bologna-aligned letter-grade GPA, and an ECTS credit conversion all at once, and why no single national table ties the three together.

Kazakhstan's grading problem isn't one scale that's hard to read, it's that current transcripts can legitimately carry pieces of three different systems at once: a Soviet-legacy 2-to-5 numeric mark, a Bologna-aligned letter grade with its own institution-specific GPA computation, and an ECTS credit conversion layered on top for universities with European partnerships. No single Kazakhstani ministry table ties all three together, and the handful of university-level and third-party tables that do exist don't fully agree with each other.

The Soviet-legacy 5-point mark still shows up

Kazakhstan inherited the same basic grading convention used across much of the former Soviet space: a numeric mark running from 2 to 5, where 5 is excellent (otlichno), 4 is good, 3 is satisfactory (the lowest passing grade), and 2 is a fail. Schools and some university coursework still report results this way, and some records carry this mark as the primary figure rather than a computed GPA. If your transcript shows single-digit marks in this 2-to-5 range rather than letter grades or a decimal GPA figure, you're looking at this legacy scale, and it's worth explicitly labeling it as such (rather than an unexplained number) wherever you report it.

The newer letter-grade and GPA system

Universities that have adopted a Bologna-aligned credit system instead (or in addition) report a letter-grade breakdown, commonly described as running from A down through D with plus and minus variants, alongside an F for failure, and compute a cumulative GPA from it on a 0-to-4.00 scale. Satbayev University (formerly KazNRTU), one of the few institutions whose own transcript key we could confirm directly, publishes a table with a maximum GPA of 4.00, mapping A to 4.0, A- to 3.67, B+ to 3.33, and B to 3.0, each tied to a specific percentage band (for instance, 95 to 100 percent mapping to an A). Other Kazakhstani universities publish their own versions of broadly the same structure, but the exact percentage cutoffs for each letter aren't guaranteed to be identical from one school to the next, so treat Satbayev's table as one real, confirmed example rather than a national standard every institution follows exactly.

Why third-party calculators disagree with each other

Search for a generic "Kazakhstan to US GPA" conversion and you'll find several calculator sites, and they don't converge on one answer. One engineering-school GPA reference maps a 5-point mark directly to the US 4.0 scale (5 to 4.0, 4 to 3.0, 3 to 2.0), treating the legacy mark as if it were already GPA-equivalent. A separate UK postgraduate admissions table instead describes a different mapping on what it also calls a "5.0 scale," placing 90 percent at 4.5 and 85 percent at 4.0, figures that don't line up cleanly with either the simple 5-to-4.0 mapping or with Satbayev's own institutional table above. At least one source also conflates the older 5-point mark with ECTS grading outright, describing them as effectively the same system, which they aren't. None of this is a single settled national conversion, it's several independently built approximations that happen to coexist online.

ECTS conversion runs through each university's own ratio

For applicants targeting a European programme, a further layer applies: converting Kazakhstani academic credits into ECTS credits. At least one Kazakhstani university publishes its own fixed conversion table, for example listing 3 of its own credits as equivalent to 5 ECTS credits, and 5 credits as equivalent to 9. A separate university instead describes multiplying its own credits by a ratio that depends on the specific content of each discipline, rather than one constant multiplier applied uniformly across every course. If an ECTS-equivalent figure matters for your application, use the conversion table your own issuing university actually publishes rather than assuming a flat ratio transfers across institutions.

A named example of how far institutions can diverge: Nazarbayev University

Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan's flagship English-medium research university with extensive international partnerships, is a useful concrete example of how much an individual institution's own table can differ from the generic pictures above. Its own registrar page confirms the university uses a letter-grading system (A, B, C, D, and F) and that an A carries 4.00 points, consistent with a standard US 4.0 scale anchor, though we could not confirm the full points table for every intermediate letter from the registrar page itself. A third-party aggregator site instead lists a completely different set of labels for Nazarbayev, SP, HP, P, LP, and F, with numeric values like 3.500 for one of the middle bands, a naming convention that doesn't match the university's own registrar page at all. That mismatch is worth sitting with for a moment: even for one of the country's most internationally oriented universities, the third-party aggregator and the institution's own official page describe genuinely different systems. If your degree is from Nazarbayev specifically, go to its registrar's own published table rather than any aggregator result.

No single ministry-level table settles this

We could not locate an official Kazakhstani Ministry of Science and Higher Education table that unifies the 5-point legacy mark, the newer letter-grade GPA, and ECTS credit conversion into one authoritative national standard. What exists instead is genuinely fragmented across individual university registrars, each publishing its own transcript key, plus a handful of third-party GPA calculator sites that disagree with those university tables and with each other. That fragmentation is the real takeaway for this country, there isn't a single number to memorize, there's a specific institutional table you need to track down for your own transcript.

Why this conversion question has real stakes for Bolashak applicants specifically

For Kazakhstani readers specifically, this isn't just a formatting question for a foreign application, your own GPA on your own Kazakhstani diploma can be a hard eligibility gate for Bolashak, the country's own outbound government scholarship. Official-style government sources describe a minimum GPA requirement on your bachelor's or specialist diploma for several Bolashak categories, commonly cited as at least 3.00 on a 4.00 or 4.33 scale, or 4.00 on a 5.00 scale, alongside a separate language-proficiency requirement. At least one source describes this threshold having moved over time, reportedly raised to 3.3 at one point and later brought back down to 3.0 for some categories, though the exact dates of each change weren't confirmed in the research for this guide. Because the threshold is both consequential and subject to change, check the current figure directly on Bolashak's own official site for your specific category rather than relying on a generic third-party guide, several of which cite figures (a flat 3.5 for doctoral applicants, for instance) that don't match the official category-specific rules described above. Our guide to PhD and Masters funding for Kazakhstani students abroad covers Bolashak's broader application mechanics beyond the GPA gate.

What a formal credential evaluation changes

Given how much the available online tables disagree, a formal evaluation from a NACES-member agency such as WES or ECE is the more defensible route when an application specifically requires one, since these evaluators apply their own documented, consistent methodology to your actual transcript and credential type rather than running your record through whichever generic calculator happens to rank well in a search result. Our WES vs. ECE vs. IQAS guide covers how to choose between evaluators depending on your target country and programme.

What to put in a cold email instead of a converted number

If you're emailing a potential advisor rather than submitting a formal application, skip the conversion math entirely and report your record exactly as your own transcript states it, for example "cumulative GPA 3.7 out of 4.0 (institutional scale)" if your university uses the newer letter-grade system, or "final grade 5 out of 5 (Kazakhstani scale)" if your record uses the legacy mark, alongside your actual degree and field. A specific, correctly labeled figure reads as more credible than an unexplained self-converted US GPA, especially in a field where the reader has no independent way to check which Kazakhstani scale you actually started from. If you're researching funding routes for Kazakhstani applicants specifically, our guide to PhD and Masters funding for Kazakhstani students abroad covers the Bolashak programme's own application mechanics in detail.

GradScoutFunding searches professors by field and country, confirms they're actively publishing, and drafts a personalized first email grounded in their real recent paper for you to review and send yourself, it never sends anything automatically. The free tier gives you 2 credits with no card required, and paid credit packs are one-time purchases that never expire.

Common questions

Does Kazakhstan use a 5-point scale or a 4.0 GPA?

Both, depending on the institution and sometimes the cohort year. Many Kazakhstani transcripts still carry the Soviet-legacy 5-point mark (2 to 5, where 5 is excellent and 2 is a fail), while universities that have adopted a Bologna-aligned credit system typically also compute a GPA on a 0-to-4.00 scale from a letter-grade breakdown. It's genuinely common to see both systems referenced on the same academic record, one as the underlying numeric mark, the other as a computed cumulative figure, so check which one your own transcript is actually reporting before you do anything with it.

Is there one official Kazakhstani government conversion table to a US GPA?

We could not find one in the research for this guide. What exists instead is a patchwork of institution-level tables, Satbayev University's own transcript key is one real example, that set out how that specific university's letter grades map to its own 4.00-point GPA and to percentage bands, alongside separate, uncoordinated third-party GPA calculator sites that don't fully agree with each other or with any single university's own table. For a formal application, rely on your issuing university's own published grading key or a NACES-member credential evaluation rather than a generic online converter.

What does Kazakhstan's letter-grade system actually look like?

Universities that have adopted it generally use a scale with multiple positive letter grades, commonly described as running from A down through D with plus and minus variants (so A, A-, B+, B, B-, and so on), plus a single failing grade, F. Satbayev University's own published key, for instance, maps A to a GPA of 4.0, A- to 3.67, B+ to 3.33, and B to 3.0, each tied to its own percentage band. Other universities publish their own versions of this same basic structure, and the exact percentage cutoffs for each letter aren't guaranteed to match from one institution to the next.

How do Kazakhstani credits convert to ECTS credits?

Not with one fixed multiplier across the whole country. At least one Kazakhstani university's own published table converts its national credits into ECTS using specific ratios, for example listing 3 of its own credits as equal to 5 ECTS credits and 5 as equal to 9, while another university describes multiplying its credits by a ratio that depends on the specific discipline and course content rather than one constant. If you need an ECTS-equivalent figure for a European application, use your own university's published conversion table rather than assuming a flat ratio applies.

What should I actually write in a cold email instead of a converted GPA?

State your record the way your own transcript actually records it, for example "cumulative GPA 3.7 out of 4.0 (institutional scale)" or "final grade 5 out of 5 (Kazakhstani scale), [degree] in [field]" rather than presenting a self-converted US-style figure as an officially settled number. A specific, correctly labeled figure reads as more credible to a professor than an unexplained single number that doesn't specify which scale it came from.

Stop writing these one at a time.

GradScoutFunding finds the professors, researches their actual papers, and writes the personalised email above: for a hundred professors, not one. Your first 100 credits are free.

Find my first professor, free