How to Find PhD Supervisors in Human-Computer Interaction (and Get Funded)

Human-computer interaction (HCI) sits in an unusual institutional position: it's computing research, but a real share of HCI PhD programs are housed in a standalone Information School rather than a computer science department, and admission norms genuinely vary between a direct-admit model and a supervisor-first model depending on the specific program. This site's general computer science field hub covers a lot of ground that carries over here, direct advisor-based admission, arXiv's role, grant-cycle funding swings, but HCI's iSchool-vs-CS institutional split and its own flagship conference venues are specific enough to need their own search strategy.

HCI doesn't have one standard departmental home

Unlike a field with a single consistent department, HCI PhD programs exist under genuinely different institutional roofs depending on the university. Some sit inside a standalone Information School, Wisconsin's iSchool PhD program is one example, explicitly STEM-designated for F-1 OPT purposes and advertised with 5 years of full funding covering tuition, stipend, and health insurance. Others sit inside a computer science department itself, the University of Minnesota's well-known GroupLens group, which does foundational HCI and recommender-systems research, is housed within the CS & Engineering department there. A third pattern places HCI inside a dedicated human-centered computing program, like Georgia Tech's. The practical consequence: when you're searching for a potential advisor, check both a university's computer science faculty list and its information school or human-centered-computing program faculty list, since the same researcher's natural home varies by institution, and a search limited to only the CS department can miss a genuinely relevant iSchool-housed HCI researcher entirely.

Admission norms genuinely vary: direct-admit vs. supervisor-first

HCI doesn't follow one single admission model across every program, and knowing which model a specific program uses changes how you should approach outreach. Carleton University's HCI program states explicitly that you need to secure a supervisor from its HCI faculty in order to be admitted, a supervisor-first model closer to the norm in UK PhDs generally than to the typical US direct-admit pattern. Other HCI programs run the more familiar US pattern, admitting you into the broader department or school with supervisor matching happening shortly after, based on the fit described in your application rather than a pre-secured agreement. Simon Fraser University students in its HCI program have described finding their eventual supervisor by reading faculty members' published work and reaching out directly once they found a genuine overlap in interests, a search process that works under either admission model, but the Carleton-style supervisor-first requirement means that search has to conclude before you apply, not after.

Funding runs through assistantship lines, not a citizenship-gated fellowship

HCI's primary federal funding mechanism in the US sits under NSF, specifically its CISE directorate's Human-Centered Computing program, but NSF's main individual doctoral award, the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), is restricted to US citizens, nationals, and permanent residents, the same restriction that shapes the search in several other CS-adjacent fields on this site. What's genuinely different is that this restriction doesn't close off most HCI funding to international applicants the way it would in a field with no alternative, because published program-level funding guarantees in HCI, from both iSchools and CS-housed groups, typically run through research and teaching assistantship lines open to domestic and international students alike. The University of Minnesota's GroupLens describes full funding through a tuition waiver, health insurance benefits, and a living stipend; Wisconsin's iSchool guarantees 5 years of funding on the same basis. Confirm each specific program's funding guarantee and its duration directly, since not every HCI program promises funding for every year of the degree.

CHI and CSCW: the field's own venues of record

As in computer science generally, HCI treats top peer-reviewed conferences, not journals, as its primary venue of record, and the two most important names to know are ACM CHI (the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems) and CSCW (Computer-Supported Cooperative Work). Checking a professor's recent CHI and CSCW accepted papers is a more current, field-specific signal of active research than total citation count, the same principle this site's general CS field hub makes about conference acceptances there. arXiv is less universally used in HCI than in machine learning or theory, so a lab or personal website listing recent publications, alongside a CHI/CSCW program search for a professor's name, is often the more reliable way to confirm someone is actively working right now.

Named HCI institutes: a fourth institutional pattern worth knowing

Beyond the iSchool-vs-CS-department split above, a few universities run a named, dedicated HCI institute that draws faculty from across the campus rather than sitting entirely inside one department. Carnegie Mellon's Human-Computer Interaction Institute (HCII) is the best-known example: it's formally a department within CMU's School of Computer Science, but its own materials describe a research community pulling in faculty from the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, the Tepper School of Business, and the College of Fine Arts, alongside computer science. That interdisciplinary pull is worth knowing about specifically because a potential advisor doing HCI work at a university with this kind of named institute may hold a primary appointment somewhere other than computer science entirely, design, psychology, or a business school, which means limiting a faculty search to the computer science department alone can miss them. The ACM CHI conference also runs an annual Doctoral Consortium specifically for PhD students to present early work and get feedback from senior researchers in the field, a genuinely useful venue to know about once you're enrolled, distinct from the main paper-submission track.

In the UK, HCI funding often runs through a named CDT

UK HCI PhDs commonly run through an EPSRC-funded Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) rather than a single department's own budget, the same consortium-style funding structure this site's other UK-focused posts describe for different fields. Newcastle University's Digital Civics CDT is a real, named example: it ran for ten years and graduated more than 55 PhD students working at the intersection of HCI, public health, and social care, before being succeeded by a newer UKRI-funded AI CDT continuing a related citizen-centred research theme. A CDT typically advertises a cohort of funded studentships each cycle with specific project themes and named potential supervisors attached, which means the practical search in the UK is less about cold-emailing an individual professor with no funded project in hand and more about finding which CDT a target university's HCI-relevant faculty participate in and checking that CDT's own current studentship list.

A practical search order

• Search a university's computer science faculty, any separate information school or human-centered-computing program faculty, and, where one exists, a named HCI institute's own faculty list, since HCI researchers' institutional home genuinely varies between these.
• Check each specific program's admissions page for whether it requires a secured supervisor before applying (Carleton's model) or admits first with supervisor matching after (the more common US pattern).
• Cross-check a potential advisor's recent CHI and CSCW accepted papers alongside their lab website, rather than relying on citation count alone.
• Confirm the program's published funding guarantee and its duration, and separately confirm whether NSF GRFP eligibility applies to your citizenship before planning around it.

GradScoutFunding is built for the outreach step once you've identified a genuine fit: it searches professors by field and country, confirms they're actively publishing, and drafts a personalized first email grounded in their real recent paper for you to review and send yourself. It never sends anything automatically, and it can confirm a professor is active, not whether a specific program's funding guarantee or admission model will work in your favor, that's set by the program itself. Our guide to reading a professor's paper before emailing them covers how to build a genuine, specific hook quickly. The free tier gives 2 credits with no card required, and paid credit packs are one-time purchases that never expire.

Common questions